JWSS - Journal of Water and Soil Science

Inefficient use of limited water resources, along with increasing population and increasing water demand for food production has severely threatened agricultural water resources. One way to overcome this problem is to improve water productivity by introducing new crops that tolerate water stresses such as quinoa. In this study, the effect of water stress at different stages of plant growth (vegetative, flowering, and grain filling) was studied on plant parameters, yield, and water productivity of quinoa (cv. Titicaca). This study was conducted under field conditions and the treatments were performed as a block experiment in a completely randomized design with four replications. Experimental factors were: treatment without water stress or full irrigation (F) and water stress treatment (D) at 50% of the need for full irrigation at different stages of quinoa growth. The application of deficit irrigation during different stages of plant growth decreased stomatal conductance, leaf area index, leaf water potential, seed yield, and water productivity, while deficit irrigation increased the green canopy temperature. According to the results of the present study, the flowering stage of quinoa was very sensitive to water stress leading to produce lower yield compared with the amount of yield obtained when vegetative and or grain filling stages are under water stress conditions.

Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) using treated wastewater is a viable strategy for water-resource sustainability in arid regions; however, the simultaneous assessment of its hydrogeological and economic aspects remains challenging. The objective of this study was to hydro-economically evaluate the implementation of an MAR project in the Qotb-Abad Plain by integrating numerical modeling and cost-benefit analysis (CBA). The quantitative and qualitative responses of the aquifer were simulated using the MODFLOW and MT3DMS models to estimate changes in groundwater levels, nitrate concentrations, and total dissolved solids (TDS). Economic benefits, including pumping energy savings, the value of stored water, and improvements in water quality, were evaluated alongside capital and operational costs under lower- and upper-bound scenarios. Subsequently, economic indicators, including net present value (NPV), benefit-cost ratio (BCR), internal rate of return (IRR), and payback period, were calculated. The results indicated that implementing MAR with an annual treated wastewater volume of 1.898 million m³ resulted in an approximately 4.5 m rise in groundwater level, accompanied by reductions in TDS from 1859 to 1752 mg/L and in nitrate concentration from 22.2 to 15.4 mg/L by the end of the five-year simulation period. Under the upper-bound scenario, the NPV, BCR, and payback period were 43.7 billion Rials, 1.36, and 3.23 years, respectively. In contrast, the lower-bound scenario was not economically justified, as its BCR was less than 1. Overall, integrating numerical modeling with cost-benefit analysis provides a comprehensive framework for supporting groundwater-management decision-making.