Showing 2 results for Esfandiarpour Boroujeni
Y. Safari, I. Esfandiarpour Boroujeni,
Volume 17, Issue 65 (fall 2013)
Abstract
In order to study the precision of qualitative land suitability classification method for main irrigated crops (i.e. potato, sugar beet, wheat and alfalfa) in the Shahrekord plain, qualitative land suitability maps were obtained for all the studied crops according to representative pedon analysis using simple limitation method. In the next step, a regular grid sampling consisting of 100 sample points with a distance of 375 m was designed. Then all required analyses were done to recognize the suitability class of these sites for each land use. Finally, land suitability results for all the observation points in each map unit were compared with the results of its representative pedon. The results showed the average of measured compatibility between representative pedon and other observation points in each map unit in class and subclass levels was about 60 % and 38 %, respectively. Due to the generalization of representative pedon analyses to all unit area, the use of soil map units as land suitability units may lead to unsatisfactory results. Therefore, the use of representative pedon is not recommended in sustainable land management and precision agriculture. However, new techniques like geostatistics can be used to improve the conventional soil mapping methods.
I. Esfandiarpour Boroujeni, Y. Safari,
Volume 18, Issue 67 (Spring 2014)
Abstract
Comparison of the land suitability variations among the soil map units in viewpoint of pedodiversity indices may provide a good assessment of the soil mapping precision. The main objective of this study was to assess the significance of functional pedodiversity thorough two detailed map units for irrigated wheat and potato for class and subclass levels of suitability in the Faradonbeh plain, using Shannon and Simpson indices. First, soil samples at 35 and 47 sampling sites in the D and E map units, respectively, were collected from the depths of 0-25, 25-50, 50-75 and 75-100 cm. Then, the qualitative land suitability class and subclass of all sampling points for each studied land use, was evaluated based on simple limitation method. Although both indices showed higher values in the subclass level of suitability, but the average functional pedodiversity of the studied map units, indicate a significant difference (95% confidence level), just in this suitability level. It was observed that the significance of the pedodiversity indices is not influenced by the land use type or the analyzed diversity index. Hence, as a supplementary procedure to study the intra-unit variation of the soil maps, use of diversity indices may provide some worthwhile information
