Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Golabi

M. Golabi, M. Albaji, A. Naseri,
Volume 21, Issue 3 (Fall 2017)
Abstract

In the present study Hydrus-1D software was used to simulate electrical conductivity, pH and sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride and sulfate ions. Field experiments were performed at the Sugarcane Research Center located in south of Ahvaz on sugarcane varieties CP48-103 with four water treatments (one treatment was Karun river water and three treatments were diluted drainage water) and three replications. The samples were collected from 0-30, 30-60 and 60-90 cm soil depth before irrigation and electrical conductivity and anions and cations of soil were measured in the laboratory. Sensitivity analysis and calibration were first performed with the aim of verifying the Hydrus-1D software. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the software had maximum sensitivity to the saturated volumetric water content. Minimum sensitivity was for the inverse of the air-entry suction, tortuosity parameter, residual volumetric water contents and moderate sensitivity was for hydraulic conductivity at natural saturation. Also, the software did not show any sensitivity to empirical parameter related to the pore size distribution that is reflected in the slope of water retention curve. In calibration stage the amount of hydraulic conductivity at natural saturation, residual volumetric water contents, saturation volumetric water contents, the inverse of the air-entry suction, empirical parameter related to the pore size distribution and tortuosity were obtained as 18 (cm/day), 0.04 (cm3/cm3), 0.63(cm3/cm3), 0.012 (cm-1), 1.2 and 0.6 respectively. The results showed that the coefficient of determination of all parameters was more than 0.85 which confirms the appropriate capabilities of the model in simulation of electrical conductivity, pH, anions and cations. In the modeling carried out the amount of NRMSE was between 11 and 18 percent which indicates good performance of the model. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency criterion was obtained 0.72 to 0.8 that indicates a good match of the model with reality. The coefficient of residual mass in this paper was positive for electrical conductivity, pH and sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium and negative for chloride and sulfate. The positive and negative coefficient of the residual mass shows less and over estimation of the model.
 


S. Zandi, S. Borumandnasab, M. Golabi,
Volume 28, Issue 4 (Winter 2025)
Abstract

Quinoa, a nutritionally rich crop with remarkable adaptability to unfavorable environments, exhibits a high tolerance to salinity. Reusing agricultural drainage water is a natural and important method in drainage management that increases farmers' income, sustainable production, and food security. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of irrigation with agricultural drainage water, salinity stress, and water deficit on the yield and yield components of quinoa (Titicaca) under salinity levels of 2, 10, 15, and 20 dS/m and irrigation levels of full irrigation, 80%, and 60% of the crop water requirements. The experiment was conducted with three replications using a split-plot design with a randomized complete block design (RCBD) at the experimental farm of the Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering at Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, during the fall and spring seasons of the years 2022 and 2023. The water requirement of Qinoa was determined gravimetrically by measuring soil moisture before each irrigation and increasing it to field capacity. The experimental treatments were imposed after seed germination and from the start of cultivation. The plants were harvested and transported to the laboratory for drying and yield component analysis upon physiological maturity. The results revealed that salinity stress had a more pronounced impact on reducing quinoa yield and yield components compared to water stress. The highest and lowest grain yields were observed in the autumn season, reaching 5.45 and 1.8 t/ha under the treatments of S1I1 and S4I3, respectively. Similarly, in the spring season, the highest and lowest grain yields were 3.87 and 0.73 t/ha under the same treatments, respectively.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | JWSS - Isfahan University of Technology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb