Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Kiyani

A.m. Kiyani, M. Zeinivand, J. Ahadiyan, I. Falorca,
Volume 28, Issue 2 (Summer 2024)
Abstract

The design of retaining walls depends on the amount of driving pressure from the backfill of the wall. Therefore, estimating this pressure is an essential factor in its design. In this research, the changes in the slope of failure, the place of the failure wedge, and the reduction of the failure line along the length and depth of the embankment were investigated on the retaining wall embankment reinforced with geotextile during ten tests in a laboratory study. The parameters under investigation in this article are the number of layers and the distances between the geotextile layers. The results showed that the presence of geotextile layers reduced the length of the fracture line up to 41%. It has also improved the value of the fracture angle and reduced the formation of the rupture wedge in the lower depths up to a maximum of 16%. The translational movement of the wall in the actuation state has a greater distinction between the fixed point and the failure zone, and the reinforcing layers are also effective in increasing the bearing capacity and stability of the retaining wall.

Sh. Kiyani, T. Rajaee, M. Karamdokht Behbahani,
Volume 28, Issue 3 (Fall 2024)
Abstract

In this research, the hydraulic parameters of flow have been investigated on SMBF flumes in two simple and multiple modes. In this research, Flow3D software was used for the numerical simulation of SMBF flow. The simulations have been performed in three flow rates (5, 15, and 30 liters per second) and three opening rates (0.075, 0.1, and 0.15 meters). The results showed that when multiple SMBF flumes are used instead of simple SMBF flumes, the maximum velocity increased by 12% on average at a flow rate of 5 L/s, 19% at a flow rate of 15 L/s, and 10% at a flow rate of 30 L/s. The energy consumption of multiple SMBF flumes has been reduced on average by 21% at a flow rate of 5 L/s, by 66% at a flow rate of 15 L/s, and by 122% at a flow rate of 30 L/s compared to simple SMBF flumes. Finally, the observations showed that during the productivity of multiple SMBF flumes compared to simple SMBF flumes, the size of eddies has decreased and the number of eddies and the area of flow turbulence have increased.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | JWSS - Isfahan University of Technology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb