JWSS - Journal of Water and Soil Science

The agricultural sector depends largely upon water and energy resources to fulfill sufficient water for producing adequate food for the rapidly growing world’s population. It requires great effort to improve water and energy productivity for agricultural products to provide consumers’ health as well as environmental protection. In this study, the volume of irrigated water, crop yield, water productivity, and the consumed energy for onion crops irrigated with sprinkler or surface irrigation methods under farmer management were measured and compared. The measurements were recorded from 2020 to 2021, on 17 farms across Esfahan Province where onion was a main crop in the region. The measured data from the foregoing two irrigation methods were statistically analyzed using t-test and Pearson correlation coefficients. The outcomes revealed that the volume of irrigated water as well as crop yield was greater for surface irrigation method compared to sprinkler irrigation, and the differences were statistically significant. Moreover, water productivity for onions irrigated with a sprinkler irrigation system was significantly higher (p<0.01) in comparison with onions irrigated with the surface method. In addition, the results indicated a significantly direct correlation between the volume of irrigated water and onion yield, whereas a significantly indirect correlation was observed between the volume of irrigated water and water productivity. A significantly inverse correlation was found between the productivity of energy for irrigation and energy consumption; so, an increase in the energy for irrigation resulted in a decrease in energy productivity. Based on the results of this study, the sprinkler method is more effective than the surface for irrigation of onion.

Given the rising need for water consumption and the decrease in available water resources, improving water use efficiency appears essential. Using modern irrigation techniques and applying irrigation management based on current, accurate scientific principles will enhance irrigation efficiency. This study aimed to estimate evaporation and windfall losses using meteorological variables and measure these losses in the cities of Isfahan, Golpayegan, and Fereydounshahr under different weather conditions. Evaporation and windfall losses were examined at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 hours using two selected equations across three meteorological stations with seven years of weather data. Then, evaporation and windfall losses were estimated using two experimental methods (abbreviated as WD1 and WD2), a science-based method (named droplet size), and field measurements. Results showed that evaporation and windage losses calculated with the empirical equation WD1 were about 2% higher than the field measurement value, while WD2 was about 1.5% lower. The correction factors for WD1 were 0.54, 0.44, and 0.51 for Isfahan, Fereydounshahr, and Golpayegan, respectively, and for WD2, it was 1.62, 1.17, and 1.56, respectively. The differences in evaporation and windage losses at various times of day and months of the year were statistically significant at the 5% level.

Climate change significantly affects the water use efficiency (WUE) and yield of field crops. This study evaluates the impacts of climate change on biological yield, grain yield, water consumption, and WUE of two barley genotypes, Goharan and Reyhan 03, under autumn and spring planting regimes using the CERES-Barley model within the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) software. Data provided for model calibration and validation were sourced from the field experiments conducted at the Isfahan University of Technology research farm located in Najafabad, Iran. Meteorological data for the period of 2003 to 2016 were obtained from the Najafabad weather station, while future climate projections for 2020–2050 were generated using the MarkSim weather generator under the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 scenario. Planting dates were analyzed within a ±35-day window relative to baseline dates of October 22 for autumn and March 3 for spring. The model demonstrated high accuracy in calibrating key traits, including days to anthesis, days to maturity, leaf area index, grain yield, and biological yield. Elevated temperatures associated with climate change reduced grain and biological yields across both planting seasons, with biological yield exhibiting a more pronounced decline, particularly under spring planting. During the 2040–2050 period, water consumption peaked at 387.5 mm for Goharan in autumn planting, while spring planting recorded a minimum of 239 mm for Reyhan 03. Delaying autumn planting by 20–25 days enhanced WUE, while planting earlier in the spring )10–20 days (improved WUE by exploiting cooler temperatures. Evapotranspiration increased by 399 mm in autumn but decreased by 267 mm in spring. The earlier-maturing Reyhan 03 genotype demonstrated smaller yield losses in spring planting due to climate change. The findings of this study suggest that programmed adjustments to planting dates may mitigate the adverse impacts of climate change on barley production, thereby enhancing sustainability.

The water crisis and climatic conditions in Iran have necessitated prioritizing low water-demand crops in agricultural investment policies. Quinoa, as a pseudo-cereal with relatively low water requirements, can be considered a suitable alternative to water-intensive crops. This study was conducted to investigate the comparative advantage of quinoa production compared to water-intensive crops under water-scarce conditions in Isfahan Province. To assess comparative advantage, two indicators—Domestic Resource Cost (DRC) and Social Cost-Benefit Ratio (SCB)—were employed. Data were collected through questionnaires and governmental sources, and shadow prices of inputs and outputs were utilized in the analyses. The statistical population consisted of quinoa producers. The results indicated that quinoa possesses a comparative advantage in Isfahan Province. The breakeven yield of this crop was estimated at 653 kg/ha, meaning that production above this level indicates the existence of a comparative advantage. Furthermore, the maximum allowable water consumption to maintain this advantage was estimated at 15,792 m³/ha; water consumption exceeding this amount eliminates the comparative advantage of quinoa cultivation. Additionally, the economic water productivity of quinoa was evaluated to be higher than that of other common crops in the region. Overall, considering comparative advantage of quinoa and its higher water productivity compared to common water-intensive crops, this product has the necessary potential to be included in the cropping pattern of Isfahan Province. However, recommendations for complete substitution require targeted and multidimensional policy interventions at technological, marketing, and policy-making levels, as well as conducting complementary research on the analysis and development of the quinoa value chain and market, investigating consumer behavior, designing targeted supportive policies for the transition period, and conducting a more comprehensive analysis of the comparative advantage of other products.