Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Auxiliary Variables

F. Abbaszadeh Afshar, ِ S. Ayoubi, A. Jafari,
Volume 21, Issue 1 (6-2017)
Abstract

Mapping the spatial distribution of soil taxonomic classes is important for useful and effective use of soil and management decisions. Digital soil mapping (DSM) may have advantages over conventional soil mapping approaches as it may better capture observed spatial variability and reduce the need to aggregate soil types. A key component of any DSM activity is the method used to define the relationship between soil observations and environmental covariates. This study aims to compare multiple logistic regression models and covariate sets for predicting soil taxonomic classes in Bam district, Kerman province. The environmental covariates derived from digital elevation models, Landsat imagery, geomorphology map and soil unit map that were divided into two different sets: (1) variables derived from digital elevation models, remote sensing and geomorphology map, (2) variables derived from digital elevation model, remote sensing, geomorphology map and the soil map. Stratified sampling schemes were defined in 100000 hectares, and 126 soil profiles were excavated and described. The results of accuracy model showed that data set 2 increased accuracy of model including overall accuracy, kappa index, user accuracy and reliability of the producer. The results showed that the multiple logistic regression model can promote traditional soil mapping and it can be used to large group of other scientific fields.
 


M. Zarinibahador,
Volume 29, Issue 1 (4-2025)
Abstract

The calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE) in soil is one of the most important soil properties. Predicting the amount of calcium carbonate equivalent in soil is essential for sustainable soil fertility management. The present study aimed to digitally map calcium carbonate equivalent using auxiliary environmental variables, Landsat 8 satellite images, and predictive models and to present the best models in the Badr watershed in the south of Qorveh district. In the first phase, a geomorphologic map was created using a geologic map and based on the ZINC method in a geographic information system environment. In the second phase, the location of 125 survey profiles was determined using the Latin hypercube technique, and the calcium carbonate equivalent of the soil horizons was measured by acid titration. The auxiliary variables included derivatives of the digital elevation model, remote sensing indices from the Landsat 8 satellite, and a geopedological map. The principal component analysis (PCA) method was used to select suitable auxiliary variables. In the third phase, the modeling was carried out, digital maps of the soil classes and properties were created, and the models were evaluated. Two different cases were investigated in this study to estimate the calcium carbonate equivalent of the soil. In the first case, artificial neural network models, decision tree analysis, random forest, and the K-nearest neighbor model were used for prediction. The multiple linear regression model was also used to combine the results of the models. Among the models used to predict the equivalent amount of calcium carbonate using the 10-fold cross-validation method, the multiple linear regression (MLR) model had the highest prediction accuracy with a coefficient of determination of 0.796 and a mean square error of 6.514. In the 5-fold cross-validation method, the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) model had the highest predictive accuracy with a coefficient of determination of 0.9845 and a root mean square error of 2.1258. Due to the spatial nature of the 10-fold cross-validation method, the use of this method is preferable to the 5-fold cross-validation method. In addition, the most important auxiliary variables in order of importance to predict the calcium carbonate equivalent in soil were the carbonate index, slope direction, geomorphology, the base level of the catchment network, and the slope of the catchment.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Water and Soil Science

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb