Search published articles


Showing 3 results for Bed Shear Stress

M. Vaghefi, M. Ghodsian, M. Akbari,
Volume 20, Issue 75 (5-2016)
Abstract

In this study, the effect of the secondary flow strength and vorticity on variations of bed shear stress for different positions of spur dike are compared through a mild 90˚ bend along with a T-shaped spur dike in a rigid bed. To carry out these experiments, three dimensional velocimeters (ADV) have been used for measuring velocity. Moreover, a comparison has been made between velocity vectors and variations of streamlines along the bend; the secondary flow strength and vorticity values are estimated for various positions of spur dike, and their effects on bed shear stress variations have been analyzed. It is concluded that the maximum secondary flow strength is evident in a distance of 0.6 of spur dike’s length at upstream under all these different positions of spur dike. Also the maximum vorticity position corresponds to the position of the maximum secondary flow strength, in front of spur dike’s wing. According to these results, it is predicted that the maximum scour occurs near the position of maximum secondary flow strength and maximum vorticity. Besides, the path of sediments motion coincides with the maximum shear stress points locus.


M. Heydari, M. Bahrami Yarahmadi, M. Shafai Bejestan,
Volume 26, Issue 2 (9-2022)
Abstract

Bed shear stress is one of the most important hydraulic parameters to determine the amount of bed and suspended load and the bed and bank scouring in rivers. Bed shear stress depends on bedforms (ripples, dunes, and anti-dunes) in alluvial rivers. In this study, the effect of artificial ripple bedforms on bed shear stress has been investigated. Two types of uniform granulation with average sizes (d50) of 0.51 and 2.18 mm were used to roughen the surface of the artificial ripples. The bedform length and height were 20 and 4 cm, respectively. The angles of its upstream and downstream to the horizon were selected equal to 16.4 and 32 degrees, respectively. Different flow rates (Q= 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 l/s) and different bed slopes (S= 0, 0.0001, 0.0005, 0.001, and 0.0015) were examined. The results showed that by increasing the particle size on the bed surface, total shear stress (tb ), grain-related bed-shear stress (t¢b ), and form-related bed-shear stress ( t²b )  increase. The value of tb , t¢b , and t²b in bed form roughened by sediment size of 2.18 mm were, on average, 22.38, 30.86, and 22.3% more than the bed form roughened by sediment size of 0.51 mm, respectively.

A. Mahjoob, . F. Kilanehei, Kh. Khademi,
Volume 29, Issue 4 (12-2025)
Abstract

One of the most significant hydraulic issues in determining the opening of river bridges is the lack of flow choking due to a reduction in the width of the flood passage. In this paper, determining the required opening for flow passage at a bridge location has been investigated using the concept of specific energy, one-dimensional, and three-dimensional flow modeling. First, the maximum encroachment of the embankments on the sides of the bridge in the river has been determined in such a way that it does not change the flow situation upstream of the bridge, using the concept of specific energy. The dimensions obtained for the bridge opening have been simulated numerically in two one-dimensional and three-dimensional models, and the flow condition at the bridge site and upstream has been evaluated and compared. The results showed that the one-dimensional numerical model predicts, on average, 67 percent higher amount of afflux than the three-dimensional model, while the maximum shear stress obtained from the one-dimensional model is, on average, 33 percent lower than that of the three-dimensional model. The effect of the bridge skewness on the amount of afflux and other hydraulic parameters of the flow, including bed shear stress and maximum velocity, has also been investigated using a three-dimensional model. The afflux was obtained at a 19.2 percent of normal depth at a skew of 40 degrees.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Water and Soil Science

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb