Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Prioritization
Prioritization and Assessment of Groundwater Resources Map in Isfahan Province
M. Moradizadeh, K. Shirani,
Volume 23, Issue 4 (2-2020)
Abstract
Water resources management depends on the precise assessment of water storage and access in each region, as well as environmental interactions of these resources. The man objective of this study was to delineate the potential zones of groundwater storage using FAHP. Mapping and assessment of it required maps of geomorphology, drainage, density, lineament density, slope and vegetation, which were initially prepared as the input layers in FAHP; the appropriate weights were attributed to them based on FAHP. Potential zones of ground water were classified into five classes of poor, average, good, very good and excellent. The number and density of available wells and springs in the study area dealt with the potential of the region for groundwater storage. So, ROC was used to assess the validation of results, considering spring points as signs of water resources. According to the results, classes of very good, good, average, weak, and very weak were ranked as the first to the last in terms of privilege order with an area of 37.7, 55, 40, 107, and 98.4 square kilometers, respectively.

Locating of Watershed Management Operations with MCDM Approach and AHP and ANP Methods (Case Study: Saqezchi-Chay Watershed in Ardabil Province)
R. Dabiri, H. Abghari, A. Ghorbani,
Volume 27, Issue 4 (12-2023)
Abstract
Management of watersheds and sustainable development today requires the most suitable and fastest method of obtaining and integrating information for optimal management and planning. One of the challenges of watershed management in the stage of planning and implementation of remedial and rehabilitation operations is choosing the appropriate and correct location; to have the necessary maximum efficiency and effectiveness, due to the high cost of mechanical operations and the lack of financial resources, select the right place to construct mechanical corrective dams has particular importance. Therefore, the objective of this research was to locate mechanical watershed management operations with a multi-criteria approach using AHP and ANP decision methods and compare the two methods in the geographic information system environment at the Saqezchi-Chay watershed. The research criteria and sub-criteria of 14 variables included soil (depth and texture), climate (type and precipitation amount), land use and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), hydrological factors and soil protection (flow accumulation, sedimentation rate, and curve number), topography (elevation and slope) and economic and social (distance from the village, from loan sources and the road). Expert judgments for weighting were collected through a questionnaire and in a field method with a statistical population of 29 experts and university professors. The results of this research showed that the ANP method had a significant correlation with the AHP method at the level of 95% and with an intensity of 0.839 and by comparing the prioritization of the two methods with Masonry Check Dams structures implemented in the Saqezchi-Chay watershed, it was determined that the ANP method prioritizes with more accuracy and resolution due to its network nature and increasing the range of changes.

Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | JWSS - Isfahan University of Technology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb