Showing 5 results for Heat Treatment
Y. Najafi , F. Malekghaini, Y. Palizdar, S. Gholami,
Volume 2, Issue 1 (8-2016)
Abstract
Recent research suggests that extraordinary combinations of strength and ductility can be achieved in the so-called TRIP steels. With the development of these steels, welding with small weld nugget size and acceptable strength are needed. For these reasons present study was carried out to investigate the effect of heat input onweld size, microstructure and the hardness of the welded metal of 0.4%C- 4%Al δ-TRIP steel after continues fiber-laser welding process. To achieve this goal a bead on plate welding with three different values of heat input 28, 60 and 80 J/mm were used.The results of welding process revealed that by increasing the heat input, cooling rate decreased and the volume percent of the δ-ferrite in weld metal increased due to the availability of sufficient time for partitioning of Al in high heat input which leads to the stable δ-ferrite and as a result the difference between the hardness of the weld metal in comparison to the base metal decreased.
B. Safarbali, M. Shamanian, A. Eslami,
Volume 5, Issue 1 (9-2019)
Abstract
In present study, the effect of heat treatment after friction stir welding dissimilar welds T6-7075 and T4-2024 aluminum alloys were investigated. Friction stir welding was performed at a constant rotation speed of 1140 rpm and welding speed 32 mm/min. After welding samples are taken under various heat treatment processes at different aging temperature and time period. Microstructural observations, phase analysis characterization and mechanical properties were performed on welded before and after heat treatment in cross section of welds joint. The results showed that post-weld heat treatment causes abnormal grain growth turns destructive effect on the mechanical properties, while formation of fine and uniform precipitation recovery strength and ductility of welds joints. It is found heat treatment based on T6-7075 and T6-2024 procedure has highest and lowest impact on the restore of weld strength. Tensile test indicate that fracture occurred on the interface between TMAZ and HAZ in retreating side (7075) at as-weld joint, if that failure happens in the stir zone by applying PWHT. Surface fracture suggested fractures in PWHT samples are predominantly inter-granular, while in as-weld joint the fractures of joints are mostly trans-granular.
Gh. Khalaj, A. Fadaei,
Volume 9, Issue 1 (5-2023)
Abstract
In this research, the effect of post weld heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the three-layer explosion welding joint of austenitic steel 321-aluminum 1050-aluminum 5083 was investigated. The welded samples were heat treated at 250 and 350°C for 10000 seconds. The structure and properties were investigated using optical microscope, scanning electron microscope, microhardness measurement and shear-compressive strength. The results showed that in all conditions, the interface of aluminum 5083-aluminum 1050 was smooth and with complete continuity; However, the interface between stainless steel 321 and aluminum 1050 had a reaction layer with variable and discontinuous thickness. During the heat treatment, the thickness of the interface layer increases according to the diffusion kinetics and reaches 18.6 microns in the maximum value. With the increase of heat treatment temperature, the average concentration of aluminum in the reaction layer of the interface increased from 85% to more than 90%, but the concentration of iron decreased from 10% to less than 5%. Also, shear-compressive strength decreases from 94.6 to 56.7 MPa.
A. Adelian, Kh. Ranjbar, M.r. Tavakoli Shoushtari,
Volume 10, Issue 1 (6-2024)
Abstract
This research studied the effect of two-stage over aging treatment on the pitting corrosion behavior and microstructure of the weld metals in the 17-4 precipitation hardening stainless steel. For this purpose, this steel was subjected to solution annealing heat treatment at 1035°C for one hour before welding. Then gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) was performed using ER630 similar filler metal. Subsequently, a section of the weldment was subjected to two-stage over aging treatment. The microstructure and corrosion resistance of the weld zone after the two-stage over aging treatment were investigated and compared with the weld zone behavior in the as-weld condition. Microstructural studies showed that the two-stage over aging treatment of the weld zone led to the tempering of the martensitic, the formation of more reversed austenite, and the formation of α-ferrite. The volume fraction of austenite in the as-weld condition was approximately %7 and increased to about %30 after two-stage over aging treatment, a four-fold increase. The pitting potential (EPit) of weld metal was -18.15 mv in the as-weld condition and reached 122.54 mv after two-stage over aging treatment, which also signifies an improvement in pitting resistance. The two-stage over aging treatment also reduced the potential differences between the different parts of welding zones reducing the galvanic corrosion occurrence. The assessment of mechanical properties through impact test revealed that impact resistance after
two-stage over aging treatment can be increased by about %66 compared to as-weld condition.
Gh. Khalaj, J. Khalaj, F. Soleymani,
Volume 10, Issue 1 (6-2024)
Abstract
In this study, the microstructure of the joint interface in three-layer explosive welding of austenitic stainless steel 321 - aluminum 1050 - aluminum 5083 was examined before and after heat treatment. The welded samples were subjected to heat treatment at temperatures of 250°C and 350°C for durations of 1000, 3000, and 10000 seconds. Microstructural analysis was performed using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The results revealed that under all conditions, the Joint Interface of aluminum 5083 - aluminum 1050 exhibited a flat and defect-free structure. With increasing standoff distance, the Joint Interface of stainless steel 321 - aluminum 1050 transitioned from a smooth to a wavy pattern, and the average layer thickness increased from 4.95 μm to 6.7 μm. During heat treatment, the layer thickness in the Joint Interface increased proportionally to the diffusion kinetics, reaching maximum values of 18.56 μm and 15.02 μm for samples with standoff distances of 6.75 mm and 6 mm, respectively. The activation energies for diffusion were calculated as 46.6 kJ/mol and 42.4 kJ/mol, and the diffusion constants were 142.2 ms-1 and 45.3 ms-1 for the same samples.
